MSK Doctor Zaid Matti

Opening Hours : Mon-Friday : 10 AM – 4 PM

Email : admin@mskdoc.co.nz  |  Phone : 02727 00100
Opening Hours : Mon-Friday : 10 AM – 4 PM

Email : admin@mskdoc.co.nz  |  Phone : 02727 00100  |  Opening Hours : Mon-Friday : 10 AM – 4 PM

Blog

Achilles Tendinopathy & Platelet‑Rich Plasma (PRP): Where Does It Fit in Your Recovery Plan?

By: Dr Zaid Matti
Musculoskeletal Medicine Specialist

Achilles tendinopathy — persistent pain and thickening in the tendon that joins your calf muscles to your heel — can sap the joy from running, jumping or even brisk walking. First‑line care still relies on progressive loading exercises, but many athletes and clinicians now ask whether platelet‑rich plasma (PRP) injections, alone or married with physiotherapy or shock‑wave therapy (ESWT), can speed the road back. Below is an evidence‑based, patient‑friendly summary.

PRP Achilles Tendinopathy
  1. Why the Achilles Becomes Soreand Stays Sore
  • Repetitive over‑load and micro‑tears trigger failed healing, swelling of tendon fibres and, over time, degenerative change.
    • Mid‑portion tendinopathy sits 2–6 cm above the heel; insertionaldisease hugs the heel bone itself.
    • Pain typically starts with the first steps of the day or during push‑off in sport.

(Straight‑talk takeaway: tendinopathy is more “wear‑and‑tear plus stalled healing” than classic inflammation, explaining why rest alone rarely cures it.)

 

  1. Cornerstone Care: Load‑Based Rehabilitation

The Alfredson protocol (heel‑drop eccentrics, 3 × 15 reps twice daily for 12 weeks) and updated heavy‑slow resistance programmes reduce pain and restore function for 60‑80 % of people, especially in mid‑portion disease.PubMed

Tip: Soreness during the exercise is normal — think of it as “working stimulus,” not fresh injury.

 

  1. Enter PRP – Why It’s Biologically Plausible

PRP is created by spinning a small blood sample to concentrate platelets 3–5 times above baseline. Platelets release growth factors (PDGF, IGF‑1, VEGF) that regulate collagen remodelling and small‑vessel ingrowth — both crucial for tendon repair.

(Key point: PRP is autologous, so allergy or disease‑transmission risk is minimal, but concentration and leucocyte content vary between kits and clinics.)

 

  1. What Do Clinical Trials and Reviews Say?

Evidence Snapshot

Bottom Line

de Vos 2020 JAMA RCT (n = 54): PRP vs saline with eccentric loading. No extra pain or function benefit at 24 weeks.PubMed

PRP offered no additive valueover good rehab.

Boesen 2017 double‑blind RCT: PRP, high‑volume saline, or sham; identical rehab. No group out‑performed sham at 6 months.PubMed

Effectiveness uncertain.

Silva Barreto 2025 meta‑analysis (10 RCTs, 679 pts). No significant VISA‑A or pain difference overall; heterogeneity high.PubMed

Updates prior reviews – still no clear benefit.

Vithran 2023 systematic review (14 trials). Concluded evidence inconclusive but highlighted wide variation in PRP protocols.PubMed

Standardisation needed.

Take‑home: Current high‑quality evidence does not confirm PRP alone is superior to exercise‑only care for chronic Achilles tendinopathy.

 

  1. PRP plus Exercise – Is There Synergy?

A small pilot RCT compared a single PRP injection to a structured eccentric programme and reported similar VISA‑A improvements at 6 months.pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov Today, many centres integrate PRP with supervised loading because:

  1. Complementary mechanisms: PRP may restart biology; exercise aligns new collagen.
  2. Clinical habit: Post‑injection “relative rest” is brief, so rehab resumes quickly.

Yet no large trial has proven clear additive gains, so PRP should be an adjunct, not a replacement, for physiotherapy.

 

  1. Adding Shock‑Wave Therapy (ESWT)
  • Focused ESWTalone shows modest pain relief in chronic cases.pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
    • A retrospective study of insertional tendinopathy found PRP (2 injections) and ESWT (3 sessions) each improved VISA‑A; protocols differed, so direct comparison is tricky.pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
    • A Phase 2 trial combining ESWT + PRP for chronic Achilles disease is recruiting (NCT06384859).app.trialscreen.org

Clinical pearl: ESWT can be scheduled before PRP to prime tissue circulation, or after PRP once acute soreness settles. Physiotherapists often weave it into a progressive‑loading schedule.

 

  1. Practical Road‑Map for Patients

Step

What It Involves

Why It Matters

1. Accurate diagnosis

Clinical exam ± ultrasound.

Rules out partial ruptures & bursitis.

2. Baseline rehab

12‑week eccentric / heavy‑slow plan under physio.

Proven first‑line therapy.

3. Consider PRP if

≥ 3 months symptoms despite adherence, or unable to increase load for sport.

PRP may “reset” stalled healing; best in mid‑portion disease.

4. Combine wisely

Resume loading 48‑72 h after PRP; layer ESWT if plateau at 6‑week mark.

Synergy is plausible, low added risk.

5. Lifestyle levers

Calf raises, ankle‑mobility drills, graded return to running, nutrition, sleep.

Tendon recovery is whole‑body.

6. Realistic expectations

Improvement tends gradual (weeks–months). Multiple PRP doses rarely needed.

Prevents disappointment & over‑treatment.

 

  1. Key Takeaways
  • PRP is safe and biologically appealing, but trials to date have not proven clear superiority over top‑quality rehab.
  • PRP may have a supportive role in stubborn cases when paired with structured loading and, possibly, ESWT.
  • Individualised treatment plans under physician and physiotherapist remain essential.

 

References

  1. de Vos RJ et al. Platelet‑Rich Plasma Injection for Chronic Achilles Tendinopathy: A Randomized Controlled Trial. JAMA. 2010;303(2):144‑149.PubMed
  2. Silva Barreto ESR et al. Is PRP Effective in Treating Achilles Tendinopathy? Meta‑analysis of RCTs. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2025;483(5):779‑790.PubMed
  3. Vithran DTA et al. Efficacy of PRP Injection Therapy in Achilles Tendinopathy: Systematic Review & Meta‑Analysis. J Clin Med. 2023;12:995.PubMed
  4. Boesen AP et al. High‑Volume Injection, PRP, and Sham in Chronic Mid‑Portion Achilles Tendinopathy. Am J Sports Med. 2017;45:2034‑2043.PubMed
  5. Kearney RS et al. PRP vs Eccentric Loading Pilot RCT. Bone Joint Res. 2013;2:227‑232.pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
  6. Alfredson H et al. Heavy‑Load Eccentric Calf‑Muscle Training for Chronic Achilles Tendinosis. Am J Sports Med. 1998;26:360‑366.PubMed
  7. Maffulli N et al. Conservative Treatment for Insertional Achilles Tendinopathy: PRP & ESWT. Muscles Ligaments Tendons J. 2017;7:17‑25.pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
  8. Pajerski P et al. Extracorporeal Shock‑Wave Therapy for Achilles Tendinopathy: Narrative Review. J Clin Med. 2020;9:2028.pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
  9. ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier NCT06384859 – Effectiveness of ESWT Combined with PRP in Chronic Achilles Tendinopathy (Ongoing).app.trialscreen.org
  10. de Vos RJ et al. One‑Year Follow‑Up of PRP vs Placebo for Chronic Achilles Tendinopathy. Am J Sports Med. 2021;49:123‑131.JAMA Network